On 03/06, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
>Hi, Qi
>
>Thanks for the cleanup.
>
>On 03/04, Qi Zhang wrote:
>>Remove CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC with below
>>consideration:
>>
>>1. a default Rx path can always be selected by setting a proper
>> rx_free_thresh value at runtime, see
>> ice_check_r
> -Original Message-
> From: Ye, Xiaolong
> Sent: Friday, March 6, 2020 4:46 PM
> To: Zhang, Qi Z
> Cc: Xing, Beilei ; dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ice: remove bulk alloc compile option
>
> Hi, Qi
>
> Thanks for the cleanup.
>
> On 03/04, Qi Zhang wrote:
Hi, Qi
Thanks for the cleanup.
On 03/04, Qi Zhang wrote:
>Remove CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC with below
>consideration:
>
>1. a default Rx path can always be selected by setting a proper
> rx_free_thresh value at runtime, see
> ice_check_rx_burst_bulk_alloc_preconditions.
>
>2.
Remove CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC with below
consideration:
1. a default Rx path can always be selected by setting a proper
rx_free_thresh value at runtime, see
ice_check_rx_burst_bulk_alloc_preconditions.
2. its not a big deal to always reserve more space for desc ring.
"
Remove CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC with below
consideration:
1. a default Rx path can always be selected by setting a proper
rx_free_thresh value at runtime, see
ice_check_rx_burst_bulk_alloc_preconditions.
2. its not a big deal to always reserve more space for desc ring.
"
5 matches
Mail list logo