Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice: fix FDIR gtp_psc without qfi pattern issue

2020-02-02 Thread Ye Xiaolong
Got it, thanks for the info. Thanks, Xiaolong On 02/03, Zhang, Qi Z wrote: >Hi Xiaolong: > Please ignore this one, since it is covered by below patch already > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/65025/ >Thanks >Qi > >> -Original Message- >> From: Ye, Xiaolong >> Sent: Sunday, F

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice: fix FDIR gtp_psc without qfi pattern issue

2020-02-02 Thread Zhang, Qi Z
Hi Xiaolong: Please ignore this one, since it is covered by below patch already https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/65025/ Thanks Qi > -Original Message- > From: Ye, Xiaolong > Sent: Sunday, February 2, 2020 4:23 PM > To: Cao, Yahui > Cc: Yang, Qiming ; Lu, Wenzhuo > ; dev@d

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice: fix FDIR gtp_psc without qfi pattern issue

2020-02-02 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 01/21, Yahui Cao wrote: >If only gtpu teid is specified, FDIR will always match the gtpu teid no >matter there is gtp extension header appended or not. >So forbid pattern in which gtp_psc without qfi value follows gtpu with >teid value like: >pattern eth / ipv4 / udp / gtpu teid is XXX / gtp_psc

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice: fix FDIR gtp_psc without qfi pattern issue

2020-01-21 Thread Yahui Cao
If only gtpu teid is specified, FDIR will always match the gtpu teid no matter there is gtp extension header appended or not. So forbid pattern in which gtp_psc without qfi value follows gtpu with teid value like: pattern eth / ipv4 / udp / gtpu teid is XXX / gtp_psc / end Fixes: efc16c621415 ("ne