Got it, thanks for the info.
Thanks,
Xiaolong
On 02/03, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
>Hi Xiaolong:
> Please ignore this one, since it is covered by below patch already
> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/65025/
>Thanks
>Qi
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ye, Xiaolong
>> Sent: Sunday, F
Hi Xiaolong:
Please ignore this one, since it is covered by below patch already
https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/65025/
Thanks
Qi
> -Original Message-
> From: Ye, Xiaolong
> Sent: Sunday, February 2, 2020 4:23 PM
> To: Cao, Yahui
> Cc: Yang, Qiming ; Lu, Wenzhuo
> ; dev@d
On 01/21, Yahui Cao wrote:
>If only gtpu teid is specified, FDIR will always match the gtpu teid no
>matter there is gtp extension header appended or not.
>So forbid pattern in which gtp_psc without qfi value follows gtpu with
>teid value like:
>pattern eth / ipv4 / udp / gtpu teid is XXX / gtp_psc
If only gtpu teid is specified, FDIR will always match the gtpu teid no
matter there is gtp extension header appended or not.
So forbid pattern in which gtp_psc without qfi value follows gtpu with
teid value like:
pattern eth / ipv4 / udp / gtpu teid is XXX / gtp_psc / end
Fixes: efc16c621415 ("ne
4 matches
Mail list logo