Ferruh,
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 5:30 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 6/1/2019 5:13 PM, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
> > On 05/31, William Tu wrote:
> >> When users call rte_eth_dev_close() and rte_dev_remove(), the af_xdp
> >> pmd return -1 (EPERM) due to eth_dev == NULL.
> >>
> >> Since the af_xdp pmd driver
On 6/1/2019 5:13 PM, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
> On 05/31, William Tu wrote:
>> When users call rte_eth_dev_close() and rte_dev_remove(), the af_xdp
>> pmd return -1 (EPERM) due to eth_dev == NULL.
>>
>> Since the af_xdp pmd driver advertises RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE, all
>> the resources are freed on rte
On 05/31, William Tu wrote:
>When users call rte_eth_dev_close() and rte_dev_remove(), the af_xdp
>pmd return -1 (EPERM) due to eth_dev == NULL.
>
>Since the af_xdp pmd driver advertises RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE, all
>the resources are freed on rte_eth_dev_close(). rte_dev_remove() tries
>to detac
When users call rte_eth_dev_close() and rte_dev_remove(), the af_xdp
pmd return -1 (EPERM) due to eth_dev == NULL.
Since the af_xdp pmd driver advertises RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE, all
the resources are freed on rte_eth_dev_close(). rte_dev_remove() tries
to detach device and subsequently calls rt
4 matches
Mail list logo