> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2015 3:20 PM
> To: Mcnamara, John
> Cc: Thomas Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: enable next abi in static libs
>
> On Fri, Jul 10,
; Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: enable next abi in static libs
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 05:46:08AM -0700, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Neil, in the meantime, could you please help to check ABI breakage in
> > the HEAD?
> > >
> > Took a look, the
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman
> Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2015 2:44 PM
> To: Thomas Monjalon
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: enable next abi in static libs
>
> On Tue, Jul 07,
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 05:46:08AM -0700, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Thanks Neil, we are making good progress.
>
> 2015-07-07 07:14, Neil Horman:
> > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:44:59PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 2015-07-06 14:22, Neil Horman:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:49:50PM +0200
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 05:46:08AM -0700, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Thanks Neil, we are making good progress.
>
> 2015-07-07 07:14, Neil Horman:
> > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:44:59PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 2015-07-06 14:22, Neil Horman:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:49:50PM +0200
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:44:59PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-07-06 14:22, Neil Horman:
> > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:49:50PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 2015-07-06 09:35, Neil Horman:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:18:51PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > Any comment
Thanks Neil, we are making good progress.
2015-07-07 07:14, Neil Horman:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:44:59PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2015-07-06 14:22, Neil Horman:
> > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:49:50PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > 2015-07-06 09:35, Neil Horman:
> > > > > On
2015-07-06 14:22, Neil Horman:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:49:50PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2015-07-06 09:35, Neil Horman:
> > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:18:51PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > Any comment or ack?
> > > >
> > > > 2015-07-03 00:05, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > > > When
2015-07-06 09:35, Neil Horman:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:18:51PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Any comment or ack?
> >
> > 2015-07-03 00:05, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > When a change makes really hard to keep ABI compatibility,
> > > instead of waiting next release to break the ABI, it is smooth
Any comment or ack?
2015-07-03 00:05, Thomas Monjalon:
> When a change makes really hard to keep ABI compatibility,
> instead of waiting next release to break the ABI, it is smoother
> to introduce the new code and enable it only for static libraries.
> The flag RTE_NEXT_ABI may be used to "ifdef"
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:49:50PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-07-06 09:35, Neil Horman:
> > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:18:51PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Any comment or ack?
> > >
> > > 2015-07-03 00:05, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > > When a change makes really hard to keep ABI compat
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:18:51PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Any comment or ack?
>
> 2015-07-03 00:05, Thomas Monjalon:
> > When a change makes really hard to keep ABI compatibility,
> > instead of waiting next release to break the ABI, it is smoother
> > to introduce the new code and enable
When a change makes really hard to keep ABI compatibility,
instead of waiting next release to break the ABI, it is smoother
to introduce the new code and enable it only for static libraries.
The flag RTE_NEXT_ABI may be used to "ifdef" the new code.
When the release is out, a dynamically linked app
13 matches
Mail list logo
