Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mem: clarify documentation for rte_mem_virt2iova

2019-11-26 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
On 25-Nov-19 11:32 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 18/11/2019 14:14, Olivier Matz: On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 02:13:06PM +, Anatoly Burakov wrote: It may not be immediately clear that rte_mem_virt2iova does not actually check the internal memseg table, and will instead either return VA (in IOVA as

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mem: clarify documentation for rte_mem_virt2iova

2019-11-25 Thread Thomas Monjalon
18/11/2019 14:14, Olivier Matz: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 02:13:06PM +, Anatoly Burakov wrote: > > It may not be immediately clear that rte_mem_virt2iova does not actually > > check the internal memseg table, and will instead either return VA (in > > IOVA as VA mode), or will fall back to kerne

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mem: clarify documentation for rte_mem_virt2iova

2019-11-18 Thread Olivier Matz
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 02:13:06PM +, Anatoly Burakov wrote: > It may not be immediately clear that rte_mem_virt2iova does not actually > check the internal memseg table, and will instead either return VA (in > IOVA as VA mode), or will fall back to kernel page table walk (in IOVA > as PA mode)

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mem: clarify documentation for rte_mem_virt2iova

2019-11-14 Thread Anatoly Burakov
It may not be immediately clear that rte_mem_virt2iova does not actually check the internal memseg table, and will instead either return VA (in IOVA as VA mode), or will fall back to kernel page table walk (in IOVA as PA mode). Add a note to API documentation indicating the above. Signed-off-by: