Hi all,
Thanks for suggestions.
I think the Oliver's first option is good.
I introduce the new function and will replace rte_pktmbuf_detach()
with it in a future release.
2016-05-16 18:13 GMT+09:00 Thomas Monjalon :
> 2016-05-16 11:46, Hiroyuki MIKITA:
>> Now, the attach operation increases refc
;
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Hiroyuki Mikita
>> Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2016 4:51 PM
>> To: olivier.matz at 6wind.com
>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: decrease refcnt when detac
2016-05-16 11:46, Hiroyuki MIKITA:
> Now, the attach operation increases refcnt, but the detach does not decrease
> it.
> I think both operations should affect refcnt or not.
> Which design is intended?
>
> In "6.7. Direct and Indirect Buffers" of Programmer's Guide,
> it is mentioned that "...wh
Hi Hiroyuki,
On 05/15/2016 05:50 PM, Hiroyuki Mikita wrote:
> The rte_pktmbuf_detach() function should decrease refcnt on a direct
> buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hiroyuki Mikita
> ---
> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/li
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Hiroyuki Mikita
> >> Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2016 4:51 PM
> >> To: olivier.matz at 6wind.com
> >> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATC
The rte_pktmbuf_detach() function should decrease refcnt on a direct
buffer.
Signed-off-by: Hiroyuki Mikita
---
lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
index 529debb..3b117ca 100644
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Hiroyuki Mikita
> Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2016 4:51 PM
> To: olivier.matz at 6wind.com
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: decrease refcnt when detaching
>
>
7 matches
Mail list logo
