Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lpm: extend IPv6 next hop field

2017-02-21 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 11:37:09AM +, Vladyslav Buslov wrote: > Hello Bruce, > > Thanks for reviewing my code. > > I noticed errors generated by checkpatch. > However all of them are due to original formatting of files. (e.g. code > copy-pasted by me as-is from same file or modifications to

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lpm: extend IPv6 next hop field

2017-02-21 Thread Vladyslav Buslov
Hello Bruce, Thanks for reviewing my code. I noticed errors generated by checkpatch. However all of them are due to original formatting of files. (e.g. code copy-pasted by me as-is from same file or modifications to original lines unrelated to formatting) I decided to preserve original formatti

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lpm: extend IPv6 next hop field

2017-02-21 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 07:14:59PM +0200, Vladyslav Buslov wrote: > This patch extend next_hop field from 8-bits to 21-bits in LPM library > for IPv6. > > Added versioning symbols to functions and updated > library and applications that have a dependency on LPM library. > > Signed-off-by: Vladysl

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lpm: extend IPv6 next hop field

2017-02-19 Thread Vladyslav Buslov
This patch extend next_hop field from 8-bits to 21-bits in LPM library for IPv6. Added versioning symbols to functions and updated library and applications that have a dependency on LPM library. Signed-off-by: Vladyslav Buslov --- app/test/test_lpm6.c| 114 ++