Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/bpf: remove experimental tag

2020-09-08 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
> > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 4:50 PM Conor Walsh wrote: > > > > The BPF lib was introduced in 18.05. > > There were no changes in it's public API since 19.11. > > It should be mature enough to remove it's 'experimental' tag. > > Should RTE_BPF_XTYPE_NUM be dropped? Good catch, thanks. Yes I agre

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/bpf: remove experimental tag

2020-09-08 Thread David Marchand
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 4:50 PM Conor Walsh wrote: > > The BPF lib was introduced in 18.05. > There were no changes in it's public API since 19.11. > It should be mature enough to remove it's 'experimental' tag. Should RTE_BPF_XTYPE_NUM be dropped? -- David Marchand

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/bpf: remove experimental tag

2020-09-08 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
> > The BPF lib was introduced in 18.05. > There were no changes in it's public API since 19.11. > It should be mature enough to remove it's 'experimental' tag. > > Signed-off-by: Conor Walsh > --- Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev > 2.25.1

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/bpf: remove experimental tag

2020-09-01 Thread Conor Walsh
The BPF lib was introduced in 18.05. There were no changes in it's public API since 19.11. It should be mature enough to remove it's 'experimental' tag. Signed-off-by: Conor Walsh --- MAINTAINERS| 2 +- lib/librte_bpf/rte_bpf.h | 10 -- lib/librte_bpf/r