Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your answer. I'll try to send the patch to netdev list and
let you know the result.
BTW, I double checked 82598 and find that it doesn't have mailbox at
all, meaning this patch is for 82599 and X540 only.
So the test is only needed for X540.
thx &
rgds,
-ql
On Thu, Oct 24,
23/10/2013 14:26, jigsaw :
> First of all, where and how should I post the patch to PF driver?
You should send your patch to kernel.org via the netdev mailing list:
http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#netdev
> And secondly I have only 82599, so I cannot run test for 82598 and
> X540. I
Hi Thomas,
>>Please, keep us informed about the needed PF patch.
First of all, where and how should I post the patch to PF driver?
And secondly I have only 82599, so I cannot run test for 82598 and
X540. Is it possible that you could test on different NIC?
thx &
rgds,
-ql
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 a
21/10/2013 16:11, Qinglai Xiao :
> Physical Function assignes Tx/Rx queues to each VF according to
> different schemes[1]. By querying through mailbox, VF is able to
> get number of Tx/Rx queues assigned to it.
>
> Note that current Intel ixgbe driver ixgbe-3.18.7 does not fully
> support mailbox
4 matches
Mail list logo