On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 10:55:29PM +0100, Olivier MATZ wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> On 12/01/2014 06:16 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >>> [...]
> >>>
> >>> Whats the advantage to keeping this warning?
> >>>
> >> The advantage is that it does exactly what it's meant to do. If someone
> >> goes to
> >> assign
Hi Neil,
On 12/01/2014 06:16 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Whats the advantage to keeping this warning?
>>>
>> The advantage is that it does exactly what it's meant to do. If someone goes
>> to
>> assign l2_len = 128; somewhere, it will throw a warning. If someone goes to
>> change
>>
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:35:28AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 03:24:32PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 10:18:06AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 02:36:46PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 0
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 10:18:06AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 02:36:46PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:25:44AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:24:58AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 0
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:25:44AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:24:58AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:18:17AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 10:09:38AM +0100, Olivier MATZ wrote:
> > > > Hi Bruce, Hi Neil,
> > > >
>
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 04:44:39PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:35:28AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 03:24:32PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 10:18:06AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 0
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 03:24:32PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 10:18:06AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 02:36:46PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:25:44AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 1
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:18:17AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 10:09:38AM +0100, Olivier MATZ wrote:
> > Hi Bruce, Hi Neil,
> >
> > On 11/30/2014 02:05 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:31:00PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > >> When compiling with
Hi Bruce,
On 12/01/2014 10:48 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>> I found that the following code works:
>>
>> tx_offload_mask.l2_len |= ~0;
>>
>> (note the '|=' instead of '=')
>>
>> I would avoid to create a macro. What do you think?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Olivier
>
> Nice one - cleanest solution th
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 02:36:46PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:25:44AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:24:58AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:18:17AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 1
Hi Bruce, Hi Neil,
On 11/30/2014 02:05 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:31:00PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>> When compiling with clang, errors were being emitted due to truncation
>> of values when assigning to the tx_offload_mask bit fields.
>>
>> dpdk.org/lib/librte_pmd_i
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 10:09:38AM +0100, Olivier MATZ wrote:
> Hi Bruce, Hi Neil,
>
> On 11/30/2014 02:05 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:31:00PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> >> When compiling with clang, errors were being emitted due to truncation
> >> of values when as
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:24:58AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:18:17AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 10:09:38AM +0100, Olivier MATZ wrote:
> > > Hi Bruce, Hi Neil,
> > >
> > > On 11/30/2014 02:05 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 28,
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 10:09:38AM +0100, Olivier MATZ wrote:
> Hi Bruce, Hi Neil,
>
> On 11/30/2014 02:05 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:31:00PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> >> When compiling with clang, errors were being emitted due to truncation
> >> of values when as
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:31:00PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> When compiling with clang, errors were being emitted due to truncation
> of values when assigning to the tx_offload_mask bit fields.
>
> dpdk.org/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c:404:27: fatal error: implicit
> truncation from '
When compiling with clang, errors were being emitted due to truncation
of values when assigning to the tx_offload_mask bit fields.
dpdk.org/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c:404:27: fatal error: implicit
truncation from 'int' to bitfield changes value from -1 to 127
[-Wbitfield-constant-conversi
16 matches
Mail list logo
