On 3/30/2017 9:22 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-12-02 16:45, Jianfeng Tan:
>> Depends-on: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/17493/
>
> The above patch is marked as rejected.
> Do we want to reject also this patch?
Above patch rejected because it may have backward compatibility issues
with t
2016-12-02 16:45, Jianfeng Tan:
> Depends-on: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/17493/
The above patch is marked as rejected.
Do we want to reject also this patch?
> When a DPDK application grab a PCI device, device and driver work
> together to Rx/Tx packets. If the DPDK app crashes or gets ki
Depends-on: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/17493/
When a DPDK application grab a PCI device, device and driver work
together to Rx/Tx packets. If the DPDK app crashes or gets killed,
there's no chance for DPDK driver to stop the device, which means
rte_eth_dev_stop() will not be called.
This
3 matches
Mail list logo