2015-10-27 11:38, Bruce Richardson:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:07:13PM +0100, Pablo de Lara wrote:
> > Since freeing a ring is now possible, then when freeing
> > a hash table, its internal ring can be freed as well.
> > Therefore when a new table, with the same name as a previously
> > freed tab
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:07:13PM +0100, Pablo de Lara wrote:
> Since freeing a ring is now possible, then when freeing
> a hash table, its internal ring can be freed as well.
> Therefore when a new table, with the same name as a previously
> freed table, is created, there is no need to look up
>
Since freeing a ring is now possible, then when freeing
a hash table, its internal ring can be freed as well.
Therefore when a new table, with the same name as a previously
freed table, is created, there is no need to look up
the already allocated ring.
Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara
---
This patc
3 matches
Mail list logo