Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] failsafe: skip devargs if not present in secondary

2019-07-19 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 7/18/2019 12:18 PM, Gaëtan Rivet wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 07:21:51PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >> On 6/24/2019 5:27 PM, Gaëtan Rivet wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 08:23:38AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:15:58 +0200 Gaëtan Rivet wrote: >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] failsafe: skip devargs if not present in secondary

2019-07-18 Thread Gaëtan Rivet
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 07:21:51PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 6/24/2019 5:27 PM, Gaëtan Rivet wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 08:23:38AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > >> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:15:58 +0200 > >> Gaëtan Rivet wrote: > >> > >>> Hello Stephen, > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jun 21, 20

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] failsafe: skip devargs if not present in secondary

2019-07-17 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 6/24/2019 5:27 PM, Gaëtan Rivet wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 08:23:38AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:15:58 +0200 >> Gaëtan Rivet wrote: >> >>> Hello Stephen, >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 03:08:24PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: When secondary process i

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] failsafe: skip devargs if not present in secondary

2019-06-24 Thread Gaëtan Rivet
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 08:23:38AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:15:58 +0200 > Gaëtan Rivet wrote: > > > Hello Stephen, > > > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 03:08:24PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > When secondary process is run was noticing that the log always > > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] failsafe: skip devargs if not present in secondary

2019-06-24 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:15:58 +0200 Gaëtan Rivet wrote: > Hello Stephen, > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 03:08:24PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > When secondary process is run was noticing that the log always > > contained complaints about unable to parse devargs. > > > > It turns out that an

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] failsafe: skip devargs if not present in secondary

2019-06-24 Thread Gaëtan Rivet
Hello Stephen, On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 03:08:24PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > When secondary process is run was noticing that the log always > contained complaints about unable to parse devargs. > > It turns out that an empty devargs turns into "" and this > value is not parsable. Change th

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] failsafe: skip devargs if not present in secondary

2019-06-21 Thread Stephen Hemminger
When secondary process is run was noticing that the log always contained complaints about unable to parse devargs. It turns out that an empty devargs turns into "" and this value is not parsable. Change the failsafe secondary to just skip doing devargs if it empty. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminge