> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 11:24 PM
> To: Van Haaren, Harry
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Mcnamara, John
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] example: add new service cores sample
> application
>
> 14/10/2017 00:20, Thomas
> From: Eads, Gage
> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 5:32 PM
> To: Van Haaren, Harry
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] example: add new service cores sample
> application
>
> Neat example. Looks good overall, I just have a few qu
14/10/2017 00:20, Thomas Monjalon:
> 25/09/2017 15:23, Harry van Haaren:
> > This commit adds a new sample app, which showcases the value
> > of running services. In particular it allows the application
> > to dynamically schedule services to service-cores.
> >
> > The sample app itself registers
25/09/2017 15:23, Harry van Haaren:
> This commit adds a new sample app, which showcases the value
> of running services. In particular it allows the application
> to dynamically schedule services to service-cores.
>
> The sample app itself registers a number of dummy services,
> and applies diffe
Neat example. Looks good overall, I just have a few questions.
> +#define PROFILE_SERVICE_PER_CORE 8
Any reason not to use 5 here? That would remove a few zeroes from the
profiles[] initializers.
> +static int
> +apply_profile(int profile_id)
> +{
> + uint32_t i;
> + uint32_t
This commit adds a new sample app, which showcases the value
of running services. In particular it allows the application
to dynamically schedule services to service-cores.
The sample app itself registers a number of dummy services,
and applies different profiles to them at runtime. Note that
this
6 matches
Mail list logo
