2016-07-22 18:56, Sinan Kaya:
> On 7/22/2016 5:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:34:10 -0400
> > Sinan Kaya wrote:
> >
> >> The current code is enumerating devices based on bus, device and function
> >> pairs. This does not work well for architectures with multiple PCI
>
On 10/4/2016 4:15 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-07-22 18:56, Sinan Kaya:
>> On 7/22/2016 5:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:34:10 -0400
>>> Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>>
The current code is enumerating devices based on bus, device and function
pairs. This does not w
On 7/22/2016 5:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:34:10 -0400
> Sinan Kaya wrote:
>
>> The current code is enumerating devices based on bus, device and function
>> pairs. This does not work well for architectures with multiple PCI
>> segments/domains. Multiple PCI devices wi
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:34:10 -0400
Sinan Kaya wrote:
> The current code is enumerating devices based on bus, device and function
> pairs. This does not work well for architectures with multiple PCI
> segments/domains. Multiple PCI devices will have the same BDF value but
> different segment numbe
The current code is enumerating devices based on bus, device and function
pairs. This does not work well for architectures with multiple PCI
segments/domains. Multiple PCI devices will have the same BDF value but
different segment numbers (01:01:01.0 and 02:01:01.0) for instance.
Adding segment nu
5 matches
Mail list logo