On 11/8/19 12:57 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 11/7/2019 10:15 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> The struct rte_eth_dev and rte_eth_dev_data are supposed
>> to be used internally only, but there is a chance that
>> increasing their size would break ABI for some applications.
>> In order to allow smooth
On 11/7/2019 10:15 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> The struct rte_eth_dev and rte_eth_dev_data are supposed
> to be used internally only, but there is a chance that
> increasing their size would break ABI for some applications.
> In order to allow smooth addition of features without breaking
> ABI com
08/11/2019 04:41, Stephen Hemminger:
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 23:15:24 +0100
> Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> > The struct rte_eth_dev and rte_eth_dev_data are supposed
> > to be used internally only, but there is a chance that
> > increasing their size would break ABI for some applications.
> > In orde
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 23:15:24 +0100
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> The struct rte_eth_dev and rte_eth_dev_data are supposed
> to be used internally only, but there is a chance that
> increasing their size would break ABI for some applications.
> In order to allow smooth addition of features without brea
The struct rte_eth_dev and rte_eth_dev_data are supposed
to be used internally only, but there is a chance that
increasing their size would break ABI for some applications.
In order to allow smooth addition of features without breaking
ABI compatibility, some space is reserved.
Signed-off-by: Thom
5 matches
Mail list logo