On 4/10/2018 9:29 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 10/04/2018 10:20, Nélio Laranjeiro:
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 09:16:31AM +0300, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
>>> When application works with LSC interrupts the ethdev layer skips
>>> the PMD callback and update according to the link status exists on
>>> devic
10/04/2018 10:20, Nélio Laranjeiro:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 09:16:31AM +0300, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
> > When application works with LSC interrupts the ethdev layer skips
> > the PMD callback and update according to the link status exists on
> > device data. It is because it assumes the link status
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 09:16:31AM +0300, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
> When application works with LSC interrupts the ethdev layer skips
> the PMD callback and update according to the link status exists on
> device data. It is because it assumes the link status on the device data
> is the correct one sin
When application works with LSC interrupts the ethdev layer skips
the PMD callback and update according to the link status exists on
device data. It is because it assumes the link status on the device data
is the correct one since any link change is processed by the application.
As multiple PMDs i
4 matches
Mail list logo
