On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 06:04:27AM +, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
> Wednesday, August 16, 2017 6:26 PM, Gaëtan Rivet:
> > > Even though it is reasonable for driver to call the
> > rte_eth_dev_port_release, I still think the ethdev layer should protect from
> > such bad behavior from the application si
Wednesday, August 16, 2017 6:26 PM, Gaëtan Rivet:
> > Even though it is reasonable for driver to call the
> rte_eth_dev_port_release, I still think the ethdev layer should protect from
> such bad behavior from the application side.
> > It is more robust than counting on the different PMD to impleme
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 02:17:16PM +, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
> Wednesday, August 16, 2017 3:42 PM, Gaëtan Rivet:
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 02:43:08PM +0300, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
> > > Currently device state moves between ATTACHED when device was
> > > successfully probed to UNUSED when device i
Wednesday, August 16, 2017 3:42 PM, Gaëtan Rivet:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 02:43:08PM +0300, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
> > Currently device state moves between ATTACHED when device was
> > successfully probed to UNUSED when device is detached or released.
> >
> > The device state following rte_eth_dev_
Hello Shahaf,
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 02:43:08PM +0300, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
> Currently device state moves between ATTACHED when device was
> successfully probed to UNUSED when device is detached or released.
>
> The device state following rte_eth_dev_close() operation is inconsist,
> The device
Currently device state moves between ATTACHED when device was
successfully probed to UNUSED when device is detached or released.
The device state following rte_eth_dev_close() operation is inconsist,
The device is still in ATTACHED state, however it cannot be used
in any way till it will be probed
6 matches
Mail list logo
