Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix argument to rte_bsf32_safe

2021-07-20 Thread Thomas Monjalon
20/07/2021 00:00, Stephen Hemminger: > On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 10:15:34 -0700 > Tyler Retzlaff wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 01:12:21PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > The first argument to rte_bsf32_safe was incorrectly declared as > > > a 64 bit value. This function only correctly hand

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix argument to rte_bsf32_safe

2021-07-19 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 10:15:34 -0700 Tyler Retzlaff wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 01:12:21PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > The first argument to rte_bsf32_safe was incorrectly declared as > > a 64 bit value. This function only correctly handles on 32 bit values > > and the underlying funct

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix argument to rte_bsf32_safe

2021-07-19 Thread Tyler Retzlaff
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 01:12:21PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > The first argument to rte_bsf32_safe was incorrectly declared as > a 64 bit value. This function only correctly handles on 32 bit values > and the underlying function rte_bsf32 only accepts 32 bit values. > This was introduced whe

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix argument to rte_bsf32_safe

2021-07-13 Thread Stephen Hemminger
The first argument to rte_bsf32_safe was incorrectly declared as a 64 bit value. This function only correctly handles on 32 bit values and the underlying function rte_bsf32 only accepts 32 bit values. This was introduced when the safe version was added and probably cause by copy/paste from the 64 b