Hi Anatoly,
Thank you for your inputs.
We will port all your patches to our platform and update you.
Regards,
Srinath.
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:32 PM, Burakov, Anatoly
wrote:
> On 07-Jun-18 1:15 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
>>
>> On 06-Jun-18 1:18 AM, Scott Branden wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Anatoly,
>>
On 18-07-09 09:02 AM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 07-Jun-18 1:15 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 06-Jun-18 1:18 AM, Scott Branden wrote:
Hi Anatoly,
On 18-04-27 09:49 AM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 27-Apr-18 5:30 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
Hi Anatoly,
We'd appreciate your input so we can co
On 07-Jun-18 1:15 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 06-Jun-18 1:18 AM, Scott Branden wrote:
Hi Anatoly,
On 18-04-27 09:49 AM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 27-Apr-18 5:30 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
Hi Anatoly,
We'd appreciate your input so we can come to a solution of
supporting the necessary memo
On 06-Jun-18 1:18 AM, Scott Branden wrote:
Hi Anatoly,
On 18-04-27 09:49 AM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 27-Apr-18 5:30 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
Hi Anatoly,
We'd appreciate your input so we can come to a solution of supporting
the necessary memory allocations?
Hi Scott,
I'm currently st
Hi Anatoly,
On 18-04-27 09:49 AM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 27-Apr-18 5:30 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
Hi Anatoly,
We'd appreciate your input so we can come to a solution of supporting
the necessary memory allocations?
Hi Scott,
I'm currently starting to work on a prototype that will be a
On 18-04-27 09:49 AM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 27-Apr-18 5:30 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
Hi Anatoly,
We'd appreciate your input so we can come to a solution of supporting
the necessary memory allocations?
Hi Scott,
I'm currently starting to work on a prototype that will be at least
RFC
On 27-Apr-18 5:30 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
Hi Anatoly,
We'd appreciate your input so we can come to a solution of supporting
the necessary memory allocations?
Hi Scott,
I'm currently starting to work on a prototype that will be at least
RFC'd (if not v1'd) during 18.08 timeframe. Basicall
Hi Anatoly,
We'd appreciate your input so we can come to a solution of supporting the
necessary memory allocations?
On 23 April 2018 at 02:23, Srinath Mannam
wrote:
> Hi Anatoly,
>
> Our requirement is, that separate memory segment (speed memory window)
> need to be allocated outside huge pages
Hi Anatoly,
Our requirement is, that separate memory segment (speed memory window)
need to be allocated outside huge pages segment.
your thoughts discussed in the link (dynamic memory allocations in
DPDK) are exactly matches with our requirement.
We tried to fit our requirement in the existing mem
On 28-Mar-18 5:51 AM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
From: Srinath Mannam
Reserved physical memory is requested from kernel
and it will be mapped to user space.
This memory will be mapped to IOVA using VFIO.
And this memory will be provided to SPDK to allocate
NVMe CQs.
Signed-off-by: Srinath Mannam
Si
From: Srinath Mannam
Reserved physical memory is requested from kernel
and it will be mapped to user space.
This memory will be mapped to IOVA using VFIO.
And this memory will be provided to SPDK to allocate
NVMe CQs.
Signed-off-by: Srinath Mannam
Signed-off-by: Scott Branden
Signed-off-by: Aj
11 matches
Mail list logo
