t; > > > Richardson
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 10:10 AM
> > > > > > To: Thomas Monjalon
> > > > > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Kantecki, Tomasz
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: Initial implementa
ary 24, 2016 10:10 AM
> > > > > To: Thomas Monjalon
> > > > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Kantecki, Tomasz
> > > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: Initial implementation of PQoS
> > > > > EAL extension
> > > > >
>
ev, Konstantin
> > > Cc: Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org; Kantecki, Tomasz
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: Initial implementation of PQoS EAL
> > > extension
> > >
> > > 2016-02-24 10:22, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > >
>
Behalf Of Bruce Richardson
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 10:10 AM
> > > > To: Thomas Monjalon
> > > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Kantecki, Tomasz
> > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: Initial implementation of PQoS EAL
>
gt; > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: Initial implementation of PQoS EAL
> > extension
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:24:33AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 2016-02-23 23:03, Kantecki, Tomasz:
> > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thom
2016-02-24 10:10, Bruce Richardson:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:24:33AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2016-02-23 23:03, Kantecki, Tomasz:
> > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > > > If there is nothing specific in DPDK for PQos, why writing an example in
> > > >
> To: Thomas Monjalon
> > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Kantecki, Tomasz
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: Initial implementation of PQoS EAL
> > > extension
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:24:33AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > &
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:31:47AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-02-24 10:10, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:24:33AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 2016-02-23 23:03, Kantecki, Tomasz:
> > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > > > > If th
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Richardson
> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 10:10 AM
> To: Thomas Monjalon
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Kantecki, Tomasz
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: Initial implemen
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:24:33AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-02-23 23:03, Kantecki, Tomasz:
> > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > > If there is nothing specific in DPDK for PQos, why writing an example in
> > > DPDK?
> > The example makes it much easier to
2016-02-23 23:03, Kantecki, Tomasz:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > If there is nothing specific in DPDK for PQos, why writing an example in
> > DPDK?
> The example makes it much easier to use the technology with DPDK.
>
> > Maybe the example should be better in
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> If there is nothing specific in DPDK for PQos, why writing an example in
> DPDK?
The example makes it much easier to use the technology with DPDK.
> Maybe the example should be better in the library itself.
The library in question (ht
2016-02-23 10:03, Kantecki, Tomasz:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > > Are you OK with concept behind V2 PQoS patch as described above?
> >
> > So you mean that PQoS don't really need some DPDK integration?
> > You just want to show how to use it with DPDK?
>
>
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > Are you OK with concept behind V2 PQoS patch as described above?
>
> So you mean that PQoS don't really need some DPDK integration?
> You just want to show how to use it with DPDK?
You are correct. The technology can be used withou
2016-02-22 13:12, Kantecki, Tomasz:
> Off the mail list, we received feedback that extending EAL commands is not an
> option due to Intel Architecture nature of CAT.
> Consequently, we changed direction when working on V2 PQoS patches in roder
> to:
> - reduce DPDK PQoS code print and reuse exis
> EAL should not depend on the PQoS library.
> Please could you hook the command line parsing and help to add these new
> options from outside?
Thanks for the feedback - we heard about dependency problem from a few sources.
> The command line options may be convenient in some cases but not
> stra
2016-01-29 13:29, Wojciech Andralojc:
> EAL extension allows CAT and CDP technologies to be
> configured via "--l3ca*" parameters.
EAL should not depend on the PQoS library.
Please could you hook the command line parsing and help to
add these new options from outside?
> Reworking existing applica
EAL extension allows CAT and CDP technologies to be
configured via "--l3ca*" parameters.
Reworking existing applications to make use of DPDK PQoS library is
a heavy lift. This EAL extension is to make it easier by adding
new command line options. These new options allow to leverage CAT and
CDP tech
18 matches
Mail list logo
