On 11/11/2017 8:30 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 26/09/2017 09:17, Stephen Hemminger:
>> The DPDK needs to stay up to date with current LTS Linux kernel support.
>> If the kernel is older than LTS it is likely to be insecure and buggy.
>> Therefore only require DPDK to work on oldest LTS kernel.
>>
26/09/2017 09:17, Stephen Hemminger:
> The DPDK needs to stay up to date with current LTS Linux kernel support.
> If the kernel is older than LTS it is likely to be insecure and buggy.
> Therefore only require DPDK to work on oldest LTS kernel.
>
> If distribution vendors want to support DPDK on o
On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 15:49 +, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen
> > Hemminger
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 8:17 AM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 08:17 +0100, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The DPDK needs to stay up to date with current LTS Linux kernel
> support.
> If the kernel is older than LTS it is likely to be insecure and
> buggy.
> Therefore only require DPDK to work on oldest LTS kernel.
>
> If distribution vendor
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 8:17 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: update oldest supported kernel
>
> The DPDK
The DPDK needs to stay up to date with current LTS Linux kernel support.
If the kernel is older than LTS it is likely to be insecure and buggy.
Therefore only require DPDK to work on oldest LTS kernel.
If distribution vendors want to support DPDK on older kernels, that is
their choice. But the ups
6 matches
Mail list logo
