Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: eventdev ABI change to support DLB PMD

2020-08-07 Thread McDaniel, Timothy
>-Original Message- >From: Thomas Monjalon >Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2020 6:40 PM >To: McDaniel, Timothy >Cc: Jerin Jacob ; dev@dpdk.org; Jerin Jacob >; Mattias Rönnblom ; >Eads, Gage ; Van Haaren, Harry >; Hemant Agrawal >Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH]

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: eventdev ABI change to support DLB PMD

2020-08-05 Thread Thomas Monjalon
> > > From: "McDaniel, Timothy" > > > > There is still "," in the name. > > > > > > > > The ABI changes associated with this notification will better support > > > devices that: > > > 1. Have limits on the number or queues that may be linked to a port 2. > > > Have ports that are limited to exac

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: eventdev ABI change to support DLB PMD

2020-08-04 Thread Hemant Agrawal
> -Original Message- > From: dev On Behalf Of Jerin Jacob > Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 1:09 PM > To: McDaniel, Timothy > Cc: Jerin Jacob ; Mattias Rönnblom > ; dpdk-dev ; Gage Eads > ; Van Haaren, Harry > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: eventdev ABI cha

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: eventdev ABI change to support DLB PMD

2020-08-04 Thread Van Haaren, Harry
> -Original Message- > From: McDaniel, Timothy > Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 6:56 PM > To: jer...@marvell.com > Cc: mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com; dev@dpdk.org; Eads, Gage > ; Van Haaren, Harry ; > McDaniel, Timothy > Subject: [PATCH] doc: eventdev ABI change to support DLB PMD > > From

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: eventdev ABI change to support DLB PMD

2020-08-04 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 11:28 PM McDaniel, Timothy wrote: > > From: "McDaniel, Timothy" There is still "," in the name. > > The ABI changes associated with this notification will better support > devices that: > 1. Have limits on the number or queues that may be linked to a port > 2. Have ports

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: eventdev ABI change to support DLB PMD

2020-08-03 Thread McDaniel, Timothy
From: "McDaniel, Timothy" The ABI changes associated with this notification will better support devices that: 1. Have limits on the number or queues that may be linked to a port 2. Have ports that are limited to exactly one linked queue 3. Are not able to transparently transfer the event flow_id