On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:51:57PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 1/13/2016 4:49 PM, stephen at networkplumber.org (Stephen Hemminger) wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:07:08 +
> > Bruce Richardson wrote:
> >
> >> So, while the two-tab indent may look "a bit weird" it does solve the two
> >
On 1/13/2016 4:49 PM, stephen at networkplumber.org (Stephen Hemminger) wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:07:08 +
> Bruce Richardson wrote:
>
>> So, while the two-tab indent may look "a bit weird" it does solve the two
>> issues
>> above. I believe practical benefits should override initial im
Using two tabs for "if" (or "while") statements is a bit weird to me.
Also, using one tab unconditionaly for function definitions and
prototypes doesn't look great.
Here I'd suggest to use the indentation style the Linux kernel
project prefers: to align with the open brace with tabs and
additonal
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 03:58:49PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> Using two tabs for "if" (or "while") statements is a bit weird to me.
> Also, using one tab unconditionaly for function definitions and
> prototypes doesn't look great.
>
> Here I'd suggest to use the indentation style the Linux kernel
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:07:08 +
Bruce Richardson wrote:
> So, while the two-tab indent may look "a bit weird" it does solve the two
> issues
> above. I believe practical benefits should override initial impressions. [It
> took
> me a while to get used to also, but now I very much like it as
5 matches
Mail list logo
