Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: clarify implicit filtering in transfer rules

Hi, Thanks you for your answer it looks to me we are on the same page but I'm not sure, also I think the result of this discusstion should be part of the commit log and documentation. Since I think this issue is not clear to many people. PSB some questions. (sorry for the long mail but I want t

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: clarify implicit filtering in transfer rules

Hi Ori, sorry, long answer below. Andrew. On 9/1/21 7:28 PM, Ori Kam wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > PSB > > Thanks, > Ori > >> -Original Message- >> From: dev On Behalf Of Andrew Rybchenko >> Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 6:11 PM >> >> As per existing documentation, attribute "transfer

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: clarify implicit filtering in transfer rules

Hi Andrew, PSB Thanks, Ori > -Original Message- > From: dev On Behalf Of Andrew Rybchenko > Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 6:11 PM > > As per existing documentation, attribute "transfer", quote, "complements > the behavior of some pattern items such as > RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_PHY_PORT

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: clarify implicit filtering in transfer rules

As per existing documentation, attribute "transfer", quote, "complements the behavior of some pattern items such as RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_PHY_PORT and is meaningless without them". That effectively confronts the idea of implicit filtering imposed by port_id argument passed by flow create API. This bi