On Thu, 9 May 2019 11:08:30 +0100
"Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
> On 09-May-19 10:50 AM, Ray Kinsella wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 09/05/2019 10:38, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >> 09/05/2019 11:37, Burakov, Anatoly:
> >>> On 09-May-19 10:06 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:
On Thu, 9 May 2019 11:08:30 +0100
"Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
> >>> If the community agrees that primary/secondary processes should always
> >>> use the same DPDK version (regardless of static/dynamic builds etc.),
> >>> then this problem would probably be solved.
> >>
> >> +1 to document that pr
On 08-May-19 11:48 PM, Erik Gabriel Carrillo wrote:
Due to an upcoming fix to allow the timer library to safely free its
allocations during the finalize() call[1], an ABI change will be
required. A new lock will be added to the rte_mem_config structure,
which will be used by the timer library to
On 09-May-19 10:50 AM, Ray Kinsella wrote:
On 09/05/2019 10:38, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
09/05/2019 11:37, Burakov, Anatoly:
On 09-May-19 10:06 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:33:32AM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 09-May-19 8:05 AM, David Marchand wrote:
On Thu, Ma
On 09/05/2019 10:38, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 09/05/2019 11:37, Burakov, Anatoly:
>> On 09-May-19 10:06 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:33:32AM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 09-May-19 8:05 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:11 AM Stephen
On 09-May-19 10:06 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:33:32AM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 09-May-19 8:05 AM, David Marchand wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:11 AM Stephen Hemminger
mailto:step...@networkplumber.org>> wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2019 17:48:06 -0500
09/05/2019 11:37, Burakov, Anatoly:
> On 09-May-19 10:06 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:33:32AM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> >> On 09-May-19 8:05 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> >>> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:11 AM Stephen Hemminger
> >>> mailto:step...@networkplumber.org>
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:33:32AM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> On 09-May-19 8:05 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:11 AM Stephen Hemminger
> > mailto:step...@networkplumber.org>> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 8 May 2019 17:48:06 -0500
> > Erik Gabriel Carrillo >
On 09-May-19 8:05 AM, David Marchand wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:11 AM Stephen Hemminger
mailto:step...@networkplumber.org>> wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2019 17:48:06 -0500
Erik Gabriel Carrillo mailto:erik.g.carri...@intel.com>> wrote:
> Due to an upcoming fix to allow the timer li
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:11 AM Stephen Hemminger
wrote:
> On Wed, 8 May 2019 17:48:06 -0500
> Erik Gabriel Carrillo wrote:
>
> > Due to an upcoming fix to allow the timer library to safely free its
> > allocations during the finalize() call[1], an ABI change will be
> > required. A new lock wil
On Wed, 8 May 2019 17:48:06 -0500
Erik Gabriel Carrillo wrote:
> Due to an upcoming fix to allow the timer library to safely free its
> allocations during the finalize() call[1], an ABI change will be
> required. A new lock will be added to the rte_mem_config structure,
> which will be used by t
Due to an upcoming fix to allow the timer library to safely free its
allocations during the finalize() call[1], an ABI change will be
required. A new lock will be added to the rte_mem_config structure,
which will be used by the timer library to synchronize init/finalize
calls among multiple process
12 matches
Mail list logo