Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] devtools: skip experimental libraries in ABI check

2020-02-21 Thread David Marchand
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 5:30 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 21/02/2020 17:13, Ferruh Yigit: > > On 2/21/2020 4:10 PM, David Marchand wrote: > > > We don't provide ABI compatibility for experimental libraries. > > > Skip those libraries by catching a soname containing a version starting > > > with '

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] devtools: skip experimental libraries in ABI check

2020-02-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
21/02/2020 17:13, Ferruh Yigit: > On 2/21/2020 4:10 PM, David Marchand wrote: > > We don't provide ABI compatibility for experimental libraries. > > Skip those libraries by catching a soname containing a version starting > > with '0.'. > > I am not familiar with the script and how libabigail works

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] devtools: skip experimental libraries in ABI check

2020-02-21 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 2/21/2020 4:10 PM, David Marchand wrote: > We don't provide ABI compatibility for experimental libraries. > Skip those libraries by catching a soname containing a version starting > with '0.'. I am not familiar with the script and how libabigail works, but +1 to the idea. > > Align the specia

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] devtools: skip experimental libraries in ABI check

2020-02-21 Thread David Marchand
We don't provide ABI compatibility for experimental libraries. Skip those libraries by catching a soname containing a version starting with '0.'. Align the special case for the glue libraries by using the soname too. Once libabigail has support for it, we will have a single type of rule. Fixes: 7