Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config: build nfp pmd support by default

2017-01-18 Thread Alejandro Lucero
Thanks! On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 1/17/2017 11:20 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > On 1/13/2017 11:50 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > >> Because using a NFP PMD requires specific BSP installed, the PMD > >> support was not the default option before. This was just for ma

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config: build nfp pmd support by default

2017-01-17 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 1/17/2017 11:20 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 1/13/2017 11:50 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: >> Because using a NFP PMD requires specific BSP installed, the PMD >> support was not the default option before. This was just for making >> people aware of such dependency, since there is no need for such

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config: build nfp pmd support by default

2017-01-17 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 1/13/2017 11:50 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > Because using a NFP PMD requires specific BSP installed, the PMD > support was not the default option before. This was just for making > people aware of such dependency, since there is no need for such a > BSP for just compiling DPDK with NFP PMD sup

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config: build nfp pmd support by default

2017-01-17 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-16 16:48, Bruce Richardson: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 04:43:11PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > On 1/13/2017 11:50 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > > > Because using a NFP PMD requires specific BSP installed, the PMD > > > support was not the default option before. This was just for making > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config: build nfp pmd support by default

2017-01-16 Thread Alejandro Lucero
My main concern is about distributions having a DPDK package without NFP support. Of course, distributions could make that package with NFP enabled, but I prefer to avoid that. There are other PMD enabled by default and it does not mean the NICs are there. On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Bruce

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config: build nfp pmd support by default

2017-01-16 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 04:43:11PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 1/13/2017 11:50 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > > Because using a NFP PMD requires specific BSP installed, the PMD > > support was not the default option before. This was just for making > > people aware of such dependency, since ther

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config: build nfp pmd support by default

2017-01-16 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 1/13/2017 11:50 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > Because using a NFP PMD requires specific BSP installed, the PMD > support was not the default option before. This was just for making > people aware of such dependency, since there is no need for such a > BSP for just compiling DPDK with NFP PMD sup

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config: build nfp pmd support by default

2017-01-13 Thread Alejandro Lucero
Because using a NFP PMD requires specific BSP installed, the PMD support was not the default option before. This was just for making people aware of such dependency, since there is no need for such a BSP for just compiling DPDK with NFP PMD support. Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero --- config/com