Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] check-symbol-change: relax rule for identifying a section

2018-08-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
17/08/2018 05:03, Rao, Nikhil: > On 8/16/2018 4:38 PM, Neil Horman wrote: > > It was reported recently that some patches that add symbols to an > > existing EXPERIMENTAL section of a version map file generate errors > > because the check-symbol-change script was identifying the section as > > "@@"

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] check-symbol-change: relax rule for identifying a section

2018-08-16 Thread Rao, Nikhil
On 8/16/2018 4:38 PM, Neil Horman wrote: It was reported recently that some patches that add symbols to an existing EXPERIMENTAL section of a version map file generate errors because the check-symbol-change script was identifying the section as "@@" rather than EXPERIMENTAL. This was fairly clea

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] check-symbol-change: relax rule for identifying a section

2018-08-16 Thread Neil Horman
It was reported recently that some patches that add symbols to an existing EXPERIMENTAL section of a version map file generate errors because the check-symbol-change script was identifying the section as "@@" rather than EXPERIMENTAL. This was fairly clearly due to the fact that the rule identifyi