Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bus/pci: fix comment explaining device naming

2020-11-20 Thread David Marchand
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 11:12 AM Gaetan Rivet wrote: > > The original triple negative was hard to read and the attempt > to improve the formulation was commendable, unfortunately the new > comment is the inverse of correct. > > Fixes: a65a34a85ebf ("eal: replace usage of blacklist/whitelist in enu

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bus/pci: fix comment explaining device naming

2020-11-18 Thread David Marchand
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 11:12 AM Gaetan Rivet wrote: > > The original triple negative was hard to read and the attempt > to improve the formulation was commendable, unfortunately the new > comment is the inverse of correct. > > Fixes: a65a34a85ebf ("eal: replace usage of blacklist/whitelist in enu

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bus/pci: fix comment explaining device naming

2020-11-16 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 11:12 +0100, Gaetan Rivet wrote: > The original triple negative was hard to read and the attempt > to improve the formulation was commendable, unfortunately the new > comment is the inverse of correct. > > Fixes: a65a34a85ebf ("eal: replace usage of blacklist/whitelist in enu

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bus/pci: fix comment explaining device naming

2020-11-16 Thread Gaetan Rivet
The original triple negative was hard to read and the attempt to improve the formulation was commendable, unfortunately the new comment is the inverse of correct. Fixes: a65a34a85ebf ("eal: replace usage of blacklist/whitelist in enums") Cc: step...@networkplumber.org Signed-off-by: Gaetan Rivet