[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Don't inline string functions

2014-05-14 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2014-05-14 08:19, Stephen Hemminger: > It makes no sense to inline string functions, in fact snprintf > can't be inlined because the function supports variable number of > arguments. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > > --- > Resend because of lack of response Please do not resend patches.

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Don't inline string functions

2014-05-14 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 4:20 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Don't inline string functions > > It makes no sense to inline string f

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Don't inline string functions

2014-05-14 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:47:01 +0200 Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2014-05-14 08:19, Stephen Hemminger: > > It makes no sense to inline string functions, in fact snprintf > > can't be inlined because the function supports variable number of > > arguments. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Don't inline string functions

2014-05-14 Thread Stephen Hemminger
It makes no sense to inline string functions, in fact snprintf can't be inlined because the function supports variable number of arguments. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger --- Resend because of lack of response lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/Makefile |1 lib/librte_eal/common/eal_