Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] ethdev: support flow aging

2020-03-16 Thread Stephen Hemminger
: [PATCH] [RFC] ethdev: support flow aging > > > > Hi Jerin > > Hi Matan, > > > > > From: Jerin Jacob > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: dev On Behalf Of Matan Azrad > > > > Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2019 3:48 PM &

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] ethdev: support flow aging

2019-06-27 Thread Matan Azrad
> > > > > > From: Jerin Jacob > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > From: dev On Behalf Of Matan Azrad > > > > > > Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2019 3:48 PM > > > > > > To: Adrien Mazarguil ; > > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] ethdev: support flow aging

2019-06-23 Thread Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
; From: Jerin Jacob > > > > > -Original Message----- > > > > > From: dev On Behalf Of Matan Azrad > > > > > Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2019 3:48 PM > > > > > To: Adrien Mazarguil ; dev@dpdk.org > > > > > Subject: [dpd

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] ethdev: support flow aging

2019-06-17 Thread Matan Azrad
sage- > > > > From: dev On Behalf Of Matan Azrad > > > > Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2019 3:48 PM > > > > To: Adrien Mazarguil ; dev@dpdk.org > > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] ethdev: support flow aging > > > > > > > > One

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] ethdev: support flow aging

2019-06-06 Thread Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
ob > > > -Original Message- > > > From: dev On Behalf Of Matan Azrad > > > Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2019 3:48 PM > > > To: Adrien Mazarguil ; dev@dpdk.org > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] ethdev: support flow aging > > > > > &g

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] ethdev: support flow aging

2019-06-06 Thread Matan Azrad
Hi Jerin From: Jerin Jacob > > -Original Message- > > From: dev On Behalf Of Matan Azrad > > Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2019 3:48 PM > > To: Adrien Mazarguil ; dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] ethdev: support flow aging > > > > O

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] ethdev: support flow aging

2019-06-06 Thread Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
> -Original Message- > From: dev On Behalf Of Matan Azrad > Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2019 3:48 PM > To: Adrien Mazarguil ; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] ethdev: support flow aging > > One of the reasons to destroy a flow is the fact that no packet m

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] ethdev: support flow aging

2019-05-26 Thread Matan Azrad
One of the reasons to destroy a flow is the fact that no packet matches the flow for "timeout" time. For example, when TCP\UDP sessions are suddenly closed. Currently, there is no any dpdk mechanism for flow aging and the applications use there own ways to detect and destroy aged-out flows. This