Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH] security: update doxygen fields

2019-09-04 Thread Anoob Joseph
> -Original Message- > From: Radu Nicolau > Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 6:28 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: akhil.go...@nxp.com; konstantin.anan...@intel.com; > bernard.iremon...@intel.com; declan.dohe...@intel.com; > step...@networkplumber.org; Anoob Joseph ; > Radu Nicolau > Subject:

Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH] security: update doxygen fields

2019-09-04 Thread Akhil Goyal
> > Hi Radu, > > Most parts of the file(rte_security.h) follows 'description after item' > methodology. Do you think we should stick to that? > > @Akhil, @Thomas, what is the recommended way of documenting individual > members of structure? Is it 'description after the item' or 'description > b

Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH] security: update doxygen fields

2019-09-04 Thread Thomas Monjalon
04/09/2019 05:41, Anoob Joseph: > Hi Radu, > > Most parts of the file(rte_security.h) follows 'description after item' > methodology. Do you think we should stick to that? > > @Akhil, @Thomas, what is the recommended way of documenting individual > members of structure? Is it 'description after

Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH] security: update doxygen fields

2019-09-03 Thread Anoob Joseph
Hi Radu, Most parts of the file(rte_security.h) follows 'description after item' methodology. Do you think we should stick to that? @Akhil, @Thomas, what is the recommended way of documenting individual members of structure? Is it 'description after the item' or 'description before the item'?