Hi Stephen,
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:29:06AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> While doing link status refactoring, I noticed that the eth_dev_link_update
> function
> return value is unused by common code (in rte_eth_dev_link_get); but is being
> expected
> by failsafe driver.
>
> The return
While doing link status refactoring, I noticed that the eth_dev_link_update
function
return value is unused by common code (in rte_eth_dev_link_get); but is being
expected
by failsafe driver.
The return values are not consistent across drivers, and link update function
is only
valid if device i
2 matches
Mail list logo