On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 11:05 AM Bruce Richardson
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 10:53:21AM -0400, Patrick Robb wrote:
> >It will break our 32 bit arm testing because we are unable to use
> meson
> >test after building for that SoC, so we run through unit tests with a
> >custom list
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 10:53:21AM -0400, Patrick Robb wrote:
>It will break our 32 bit arm testing because we are unable to use meson
>test after building for that SoC, so we run through unit tests with a
>custom list using just dpdk test. It's not a problem, I just need to
>know w
It will break our 32 bit arm testing because we are unable to use meson
test after building for that SoC, so we run through unit tests with a
custom list using just dpdk test. It's not a problem, I just need to know
when this is going to reach main so I can make the corresponding change to
the 32 b
Hello Bruce,
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 1:51 PM Bruce Richardson
wrote:
>
> While working on series such as [1] to make DPDK builds more
> configurable, the majority of the complexity involved centered on the
> unit tests, and ensuring that the individual files were added/removed
> from the build as
While working on series such as [1] to make DPDK builds more
configurable, the majority of the complexity involved centered on the
unit tests, and ensuring that the individual files were added/removed
from the build as the components were enabled/disabled.
This complexity was exacerbated by:
* C f
5 matches
Mail list logo
