RE: [RFC PATCH] ring: adding TPAUSE instruction to ring dequeue

2023-05-04 Thread Morten Brørup
> -Original Message- > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org] > > On Thu, 4 May 2023 16:11:31 + > "Coyle, David" wrote: > > > Hi Morten > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Morten Brørup > > > > > > > > > > > > Power saving is important for the envi

Re: [RFC PATCH] ring: adding TPAUSE instruction to ring dequeue

2023-05-04 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Thu, 4 May 2023 16:11:31 + "Coyle, David" wrote: > Hi Morten > > > -Original Message- > > From: Morten Brørup > > > > > > > Power saving is important for the environment (to save the planet and all > > that), so everyone should contribute, if they have a good solution. So e

RE: [RFC PATCH] ring: adding TPAUSE instruction to ring dequeue

2023-05-04 Thread Coyle, David
Hi Morten > -Original Message- > From: Morten Brørup > > Power saving is important for the environment (to save the planet and all > that), so everyone should contribute, if they have a good solution. So even if > our algorithm had a significant degree of innovation, we would probably

RE: [RFC PATCH] ring: adding TPAUSE instruction to ring dequeue

2023-05-03 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Coyle, David [mailto:david.co...@intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2023 17.32 > > Hi Morten > > > From: Morten Brørup > > > > > From: David Coyle [mailto:david.co...@intel.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2023 13.39 > > > > > > This is NOT for upstreaming. This is being submitted to a

RE: [RFC PATCH] ring: adding TPAUSE instruction to ring dequeue

2023-05-03 Thread Coyle, David
Hi Morten > -Original Message- > From: Morten Brørup > > > From: David Coyle [mailto:david.co...@intel.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2023 13.39 > > > > This is NOT for upstreaming. This is being submitted to allow early > > comparison testing with the preferred solution, which will add

Re: [RFC PATCH] ring: adding TPAUSE instruction to ring dequeue

2023-05-03 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 3 May 2023 15:32:27 +0200 Morten Brørup wrote: > > From: David Coyle [mailto:david.co...@intel.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2023 13.39 > > > > This is NOT for upstreaming. This is being submitted to allow early > > comparison testing with the preferred solution, which will add TAPUSE

RE: [RFC PATCH] ring: adding TPAUSE instruction to ring dequeue

2023-05-03 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: David Coyle [mailto:david.co...@intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2023 13.39 > > This is NOT for upstreaming. This is being submitted to allow early > comparison testing with the preferred solution, which will add TAPUSE > power management support to the ring library through the addition

[RFC PATCH] ring: adding TPAUSE instruction to ring dequeue

2023-05-03 Thread David Coyle
This is NOT for upstreaming. This is being submitted to allow early comparison testing with the preferred solution, which will add TAPUSE power management support to the ring library through the addition of callbacks. Initial stages of the preferred solution are available at http://dpdk.org/patch/1