RE: [RFC] Cryptodev: use rte_crypto_vec, group big-endian constraints

2021-12-17 Thread Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
From: Zhang, Roy Fan Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2021 4:05 PM To: Akhil Goyal ; Kusztal, ArkadiuszX ; Anoob Joseph Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ramkumar Balu Subject: RE: [RFC] Cryptodev: use rte_crypto_vec, group big-endian constraints Hi, From: Akhil Goyal mailto:gak...@marvell.com>> Sent:

RE: [RFC] Cryptodev: use rte_crypto_vec, group big-endian constraints

2021-12-16 Thread Zhang, Roy Fan
Hi, From: Akhil Goyal Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 9:36 AM To: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX ; Anoob Joseph ; Zhang, Roy Fan Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ramkumar Balu Subject: RE: [RFC] Cryptodev: use rte_crypto_vec, group big-endian constraints Hi, since DPDK 21.11 is out, we should start discussion to

RE: [RFC] Cryptodev: use rte_crypto_vec, group big-endian constraints

2021-12-13 Thread Akhil Goyal
Hi, since DPDK 21.11 is out, we should start discussion to make asymmetric API stable. - Struct rte_crypto_vec vs struct rte_crypto_param_t We have two almost identical functionally structs, one in _sym.h another in asym.h so we probably should pick one of them. "rte_crypto_vec" a

[RFC] Cryptodev: use rte_crypto_vec, group big-endian constraints

2021-12-03 Thread Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
Hi, since DPDK 21.11 is out, we should start discussion to make asymmetric API stable. - Struct rte_crypto_vec vs struct rte_crypto_param_t We have two almost identical functionally structs, one in _sym.h another in asym.h so we probably should pick one of them. "rte_crypto_vec" ad