RE: [RFC]: mempool: zero-copy cache get bulk

2022-11-13 Thread Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > From: Morten Brørup > > Sent: Saturday, 5 November 2022 14.19 > > > > Zero-copy access to the mempool cache is beneficial for PMD > > performance, and must be provided by the mempool library to fix [Bug > > 1052] without a performance regression. > > > > [Bug 1052]: https://bugs.dpdk.org/s

RE: [RFC]: mempool: zero-copy cache get bulk

2022-11-07 Thread Morten Brørup
+ Akshitha, apparently working on similar patches > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com] > Sent: Monday, 7 November 2022 10.19 > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 02:19:13PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote: > > Zero-copy access to the mempool cache is beneficial for PMD > performance, an

Re: [RFC]: mempool: zero-copy cache get bulk

2022-11-07 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 02:19:13PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote: > Zero-copy access to the mempool cache is beneficial for PMD performance, and > must be provided by the mempool library to fix [Bug 1052] without a > performance regression. > > [Bug 1052]: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1052

RE: [RFC]: mempool: zero-copy cache get bulk

2022-11-06 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Morten Brørup > Sent: Saturday, 5 November 2022 14.19 > > Zero-copy access to the mempool cache is beneficial for PMD > performance, and must be provided by the mempool library to fix [Bug > 1052] without a performance regression. > > [Bug 1052]: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1052

[RFC]: mempool: zero-copy cache get bulk

2022-11-05 Thread Morten Brørup
Zero-copy access to the mempool cache is beneficial for PMD performance, and must be provided by the mempool library to fix [Bug 1052] without a performance regression. [Bug 1052]: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1052 This RFC offers two conceptual variants of zero-copy get: 1. A simple