On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 10:08:52 +0200
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> When adding an API for creating threads,
> the real-time priority has been forbidden on Unix.
>
> There is a known issue with ring behaviour,
> but it should not be completely forbidden.
>
> Real-time thread can block some kernel threa
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 10:45:03 +0200
Morten Brørup wrote:
> Is it 100 % certain that the system becomes unstable if not sleeping or using
> blocking system calls from a real-time thread?
> And technically, it's not the thread itself that becomes unstable.
My experience is that the goal of real ti
27/10/2023 10:45, Morten Brørup:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> > Sent: Friday, 27 October 2023 10.09
> >
> > When adding an API for creating threads,
> > the real-time priority has been forbidden on Unix.
> >
> > There is a known issue with ring behaviour,
> > but it sh
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Friday, 27 October 2023 10.09
>
> When adding an API for creating threads,
> the real-time priority has been forbidden on Unix.
>
> There is a known issue with ring behaviour,
> but it should not be completely forbidden.
>
> Real-time
When adding an API for creating threads,
the real-time priority has been forbidden on Unix.
There is a known issue with ring behaviour,
but it should not be completely forbidden.
Real-time thread can block some kernel threads on the same core,
making the system unstable.
That's why a sleep is add
5 matches
Mail list logo