RE: [PATCH v5 16/21] drivers: add flex array support and fix issues

2024-07-01 Thread Hore, Soumyadeep
> With the internal Linux upstream feedback that is received on IDPF > driver and also some references available online, it is discouraged to > use 1-sized array fields in the structures, especially in the new > Linux drivers that are going to be upstreamed. Instead, it is > recommended to use

Re: [PATCH v5 16/21] drivers: add flex array support and fix issues

2024-06-28 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 09:16:39AM +, Soumyadeep Hore wrote: > With the internal Linux upstream feedback that is received on > IDPF driver and also some references available online, it > is discouraged to use 1-sized array fields in the structures, > especially in the new Linux drivers that are

[PATCH v5 16/21] drivers: add flex array support and fix issues

2024-06-24 Thread Soumyadeep Hore
With the internal Linux upstream feedback that is received on IDPF driver and also some references available online, it is discouraged to use 1-sized array fields in the structures, especially in the new Linux drivers that are going to be upstreamed. Instead, it is recommended to use flex array fie