RE: [PATCH v3] mbuf: add ESP packet type

2023-10-18 Thread Alexander Kozyrev
> As per IPSEC ESP RFC 4303, for both tunnel mode or transport mode, > next proto 50, so we cannot identify a packet is for tunnel mode or > transport mode by just packet parsing. > Am I missing something ? You are absolutely correct, the only way to tell the difference is to parse the next_proto f

Re: [PATCH v3] mbuf: add ESP packet type

2023-09-20 Thread Nithin Dabilpuram
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 11:53 PM Alexander Kozyrev wrote: > > Support the IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) in transport mode. As per IPSEC ESP RFC 4303, for both tunnel mode or transport mode, next proto 50, so we cannot identify a packet is for tunnel mode or transport mode by just packet

RE: [PATCH v3] mbuf: add ESP packet type

2023-08-31 Thread Ori Kam
> -Original Message- > From: Alexander Kozyrev > Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 9:23 PM > > Support the IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) in transport mode. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kozyrev > Acked-by: Morten Brørup > --- > lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_ptype.h | 36 +++

[PATCH v3] mbuf: add ESP packet type

2023-08-28 Thread Alexander Kozyrev
Support the IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) in transport mode. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kozyrev Acked-by: Morten Brørup --- lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_ptype.h | 36 ++-- 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_ptype.h b/lib