Morten Brørup writes:
> @Aaron, do you have any insights or comments to my curiosity below?
Sorry, the perf tests from Feb to Oct should *generally* be comparable
but keep in mind that they are based on different baseline versions of
DPDK. Also, the perf tests are done as thresholds rather than
> From: Andrew Rybchenko [mailto:andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru]
> Sent: Tuesday, 4 October 2022 17.59
>
> On 10/4/22 18:13, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > @Aaron, do you have any insights or comments to my curiosity below?
> >
> >> From: Andrew Rybchenko [mailto:andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru]
> >> Sent:
RESENT for test purposes.
A flush threshold for the mempool cache was introduced in DPDK version
1.3, but rte_mempool_do_generic_get() was not completely updated back
then, and some inefficiencies were introduced.
This patch fixes the following in rte_mempool_do_generic_get():
1. The code that i
RESENT for test purposes.
A flush threshold for the mempool cache was introduced in DPDK version
1.3, but rte_mempool_do_generic_get() was not completely updated back
then, and some inefficiencies were introduced.
This patch fixes the following in rte_mempool_do_generic_get():
1. The code that i
RESENT for test purposes.
A flush threshold for the mempool cache was introduced in DPDK version 1.3, but
rte_mempool_do_generic_get() was not completely updated back then, and some
inefficiencies were introduced.
This patch fixes the following in rte_mempool_do_generic_get():
1. The code that
On 10/4/22 18:13, Morten Brørup wrote:
@Aaron, do you have any insights or comments to my curiosity below?
From: Andrew Rybchenko [mailto:andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru]
Sent: Tuesday, 4 October 2022 14.58
Hi Morten,
In general I agree that the fix is required.
In sent v3 I'm trying to make it
@Aaron, do you have any insights or comments to my curiosity below?
> From: Andrew Rybchenko [mailto:andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru]
> Sent: Tuesday, 4 October 2022 14.58
>
> Hi Morten,
>
> In general I agree that the fix is required.
> In sent v3 I'm trying to make it a bit better from my point
Hi Morten,
In general I agree that the fix is required.
In sent v3 I'm trying to make it a bit better from my point of
view. See few notes below.
On 2/2/22 11:14, Morten Brørup wrote:
A flush threshold for the mempool cache was introduced in DPDK version
1.3, but rte_mempool_do_generic_get() wa
PING again.
If the explanation and/or diff is too longwinded, just look at the resulting
code instead - it is clean and easily readable.
This patch should not be controversial, so I would like to see it merged into
the coming LTS release. (Unlike my other mempool patch [3], which changes the
b
+CC: Beilei Xing , i40e maintainer, may be interested in
the performance improvements achieved by this patch.
> From: Morten Brørup [mailto:m...@smartsharesystems.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2022 09.14
>
> A flush threshold for the mempool cache was introduced in DPDK version
> 1.3, but r
A flush threshold for the mempool cache was introduced in DPDK version
1.3, but rte_mempool_do_generic_get() was not completely updated back
then, and some inefficiencies were introduced.
This patch fixes the following in rte_mempool_do_generic_get():
1. The code that initially screens the cache
11 matches
Mail list logo
