On 5/16/2025 9:30 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 3/27/2025 8:57 AM, Yang Ming wrote:
DPDK detect vfio container according the existence of vfio
module. But for container with non-privileged mode, there is
possibility that no VFIO_DIR(/dev/vfio) mapping from host to
container when host have both
On 3/27/2025 8:57 AM, Yang Ming wrote:
DPDK detect vfio container according the existence of vfio
module. But for container with non-privileged mode, there is
possibility that no VFIO_DIR(/dev/vfio) mapping from host to
container when host have both Intel NIC and Mellanox NIC but
this conntainer
On 5/16/2025 2:46 PM, David Marchand wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 8:57 AM Yang Ming wrote:
DPDK detect vfio container according the existence of vfio
module. But for container with non-privileged mode, there is
possibility that no VFIO_DIR(/dev/vfio) mapping from host to
container when host ha
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 8:57 AM Yang Ming wrote:
>
> DPDK detect vfio container according the existence of vfio
> module. But for container with non-privileged mode, there is
> possibility that no VFIO_DIR(/dev/vfio) mapping from host to
> container when host have both Intel NIC and Mellanox NIC b
DPDK detect vfio container according the existence of vfio
module. But for container with non-privileged mode, there is
possibility that no VFIO_DIR(/dev/vfio) mapping from host to
container when host have both Intel NIC and Mellanox NIC but
this conntainer only allocate VFs from Mellanox NIC.
In t
5 matches
Mail list logo
