On 2/7/2024 10:36 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 19:10:37 +
> Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>
>> ../drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c:1246:18: error: shift count
>>> = width of type [-Werror,-Wshift-count-overflow]
>> matches_count = MCDI_OUT_DWORD(req,
>>
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 19:10:37 +
Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> ../drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c:1246:18: error: shift count
> >= width of type [-Werror,-Wshift-count-overflow]
> matches_count = MCDI_OUT_DWORD(req,
> ^~~
> ../drivers/common/sf
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 19:10:37 +
Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 1/19/2024 10:13 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > The sfc base code had its own definition of static assertions
> > using the out of bound array access hack. Replace it with a
> > static_assert like rte_common.h.
> >
> > Fixes: f67e471914
On 1/19/2024 10:13 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The sfc base code had its own definition of static assertions
> using the out of bound array access hack. Replace it with a
> static_assert like rte_common.h.
>
> Fixes: f67e4719147d ("net/sfc/base: fix coding style")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemmi
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Friday, 19 January 2024 23.14
>
> The sfc base code had its own definition of static assertions
> using the out of bound array access hack. Replace it with a
> static_assert like rte_common.h.
>
> Fixes: f67e4719147d ("net/sfc/
The sfc base code had its own definition of static assertions
using the out of bound array access hack. Replace it with a
static_assert like rte_common.h.
Fixes: f67e4719147d ("net/sfc/base: fix coding style")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger
Acked-by: Morten Brørup
---
v2 - add assert.h to make
6 matches
Mail list logo
