Re: [PATCH 1/1] mempool: implement index-based per core cache

Hi, Thank you for the comments! Based on the suggestions, I tested the patch for single core L3Fwd performance with increased number of routes/flows (maximum 8K) to increase cache footprint. However, I don’t see much improvement with the patch. > On Jan 21, 2022, at 5:25 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin

RE: [PATCH 1/1] mempool: implement index-based per core cache

> > > Hi Dharmik, > > > > > >>> > > Current mempool per core cache implementation stores pointers to mbufs > > On 64b architectures, each pointer consumes 8B > > This patch replaces it with index-based implementation, > > where in each buffer is addressed by (pool base addre

RE: [PATCH 1/1] mempool: implement index-based per core cache

Hi Dharmik, > > > >>> > Current mempool per core cache implementation stores pointers to mbufs > On 64b architectures, each pointer consumes 8B > This patch replaces it with index-based implementation, > where in each buffer is addressed by (pool base address + index) > I

Re: [PATCH 1/1] mempool: implement index-based per core cache

Hi Konstatin, > On Jan 13, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin > wrote: > > > Hi Dharmik, > >>> Current mempool per core cache implementation stores pointers to mbufs On 64b architectures, each pointer consumes 8B This patch replaces it with index-based implementation,

RE: [PATCH 1/1] mempool: implement index-based per core cache

Hi Dharmik, > > > >> Current mempool per core cache implementation stores pointers to mbufs > >> On 64b architectures, each pointer consumes 8B > >> This patch replaces it with index-based implementation, > >> where in each buffer is addressed by (pool base address + index) > >> It reduces the a

Re: [PATCH 1/1] mempool: implement index-based per core cache

Hi Konstatin, Thank you for your comments and the test report! > On Jan 10, 2022, at 8:26 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin > wrote: > > > > >> Current mempool per core cache implementation stores pointers to mbufs >> On 64b architectures, each pointer consumes 8B >> This patch replaces it with index

RE: [PATCH 1/1] mempool: implement index-based per core cache

> Current mempool per core cache implementation stores pointers to mbufs > On 64b architectures, each pointer consumes 8B > This patch replaces it with index-based implementation, > where in each buffer is addressed by (pool base address + index) > It reduces the amount of memory/cache require

[PATCH 1/1] mempool: implement index-based per core cache

Current mempool per core cache implementation stores pointers to mbufs On 64b architectures, each pointer consumes 8B This patch replaces it with index-based implementation, where in each buffer is addressed by (pool base address + index) It reduces the amount of memory/cache required for per core