On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 03:23:19AM -0400, Khadem Ullah wrote:
> Hi Dariusz,
>
> Yes, you are right — I believe this has been fixed since DPDK v24.11 by the
> commit you mentioned:
> https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/commit/c30b356a4d48542fe99c47aa470afc8cd1ced9f5
>
> Previously, this appeared to be a
Hi Dariusz,
Yes, you are right ??? I believe this has been fixed since DPDK v24.11 by the
commit you mentioned:
https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/commit/c30b356a4d48542fe99c47aa470afc8cd1ced9f5
Previously, this appeared to be an edge case where a segfault was triggered
when a transfer rule was creat
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 07:39:53PM +0200, Dariusz Sosnowski wrote:
> + mlx5 maintainers
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 08:36:17AM -0400, Khadem Ullah wrote:
> > When creating a flow rule with the transfer attribute and a meter action,
> > the driver did not validate this
+ mlx5 maintainers
Thank you for the patch.
On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 08:36:17AM -0400, Khadem Ullah wrote:
> When creating a flow rule with the transfer attribute and a meter action,
> the driver did not validate this combination and would crash due to
> unsupported handling.
>
> This patch adds
When creating a flow rule with the transfer attribute and a meter action,
the driver did not validate this combination and would crash due to
unsupported handling.
This patch adds explicit validation rejecting meter action in transfer
flows with an appropriate error message.
Fixes: 46a5e6bc6a85 (
5 matches
Mail list logo