On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 11:24:43AM -0700, Andre Muezerie wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 03:54:58PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > There was an issue with building DPDK using mingw v8.1[1], which
> > required using the "-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables" compiler flag when
> > building using the
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 03:54:58PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> There was an issue with building DPDK using mingw v8.1[1], which
> required using the "-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables" compiler flag when
> building using the mingw compiler. However, recent versions of the
> compiler no longer se
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 01:37:25PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 09:11:10AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 16:58:49 +0100
> > David Marchand wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 4:55 PM Bruce Richardson
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There wa
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 09:11:10AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 16:58:49 +0100
> David Marchand wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 4:55 PM Bruce Richardson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > There was an issue with building DPDK using mingw v8.1[1], which
> > > required using the
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 4:55 PM Bruce Richardson
wrote:
>
> There was an issue with building DPDK using mingw v8.1[1], which
> required using the "-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables" compiler flag when
> building using the mingw compiler. However, recent versions of the
> compiler no longer seem to n
There was an issue with building DPDK using mingw v8.1[1], which
required using the "-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables" compiler flag when
building using the mingw compiler. However, recent versions of the
compiler no longer seem to need this flag, so remove it.
[1]
https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/cajfa
6 matches
Mail list logo