> This is a great idea. Would introducing a new devarg, (e.g
> 'fanout_mode') be the proper way to allow the application to customize
> fanout in more detail ?
>
> --vdev=net_af_packet0,iface=eth1,blocksz=4096,framesz=2048,framecnt=512,qpairs=1,fanout_mode=[fanout_hash|fanout_cpu|fanout_rnd|fanout_
> Controlling fanout more is a good idea but not sure what this patch
> is trying to do with it.
I am maintaining a DPDK application which should run on a large number
of setups.
Unfortunately, I do not have a lot of control over the environment the
application runs on (e.g kernel).
The problem I
This allows us to control whether the PMD will attempt to use
the PACKET_FANOUT socket option, and allows the binary compiled
against newer kernel headers to run on an older kernel, which
lacks support for it.
Signed-off-by: Tudor Cornea
---
doc/guides/nics/af_packet.rst | 4 ++-
dr
3 matches
Mail list logo