On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:48 PM Naga Harish K, S V
wrote:
>
> As per the DPDK contribution guidelines,
> Ideally, the review should be done within 1 week of patch submission to the
> mailing list.
> https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/contributing/patches.html
>
> Surprised to see this review request pin
contribution guidelines.
-Harish
From: Jerin Jacob
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 9:59 PM
To: Rahul Bhansali
Cc: dev@dpdk.org ; Naga Harish K, S V
; Jerin Jacob ; Kundapura,
Ganapati ; sta...@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eventdev/eth_rx: fix timestamp field
@dpdk.org; Naga Harish K, S V ;
> > Jerin Jacob ; Kundapura, Ganapati
> >
> > Cc: Rahul Bhansali ; sta...@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [PATCH] eventdev/eth_rx: fix timestamp field register in mbuf
> >
> > For eventdev internal port, timestamp dynamic field registration
> -Original Message-
> From: Rahul Bhansali
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 1:56 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Naga Harish K, S V ; Jerin
> Jacob ; Kundapura, Ganapati
>
> Cc: Rahul Bhansali ; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH] eventdev/eth_rx: fix timestam
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 6:46 PM Rahul Bhansali wrote:
>
> For eventdev internal port, timestamp dynamic field registration
> in mbuf is not required as that will be done from net device.
> For SW eventdev, Rx timestamp field registration will be
> done during Rx queue add operation as per device c
For eventdev internal port, timestamp dynamic field registration
in mbuf is not required as that will be done from net device.
For SW eventdev, Rx timestamp field registration will be
done during Rx queue add operation as per device capabilities and
offload configuration.
Fixes: 83ab470d1259 ("eve
6 matches
Mail list logo
