13/02/2023 17:36, Raslan Darawsheh:
> From: Morten Brørup
> > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 03:44:55PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> > > > Venerable RHEL7 clang 3.4.2 has (at least) two issues with lock
> > > > annotations.
> > > >
> > >
ject: RE: [PATCH] disable lock annotation with clang 3.4.2
>
> > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> > Sent: Monday, 13 February 2023 15.55
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 03:44:55PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> > > Venerable RHEL7
> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2023 15.55
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 03:44:55PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> > Venerable RHEL7 clang 3.4.2 has (at least) two issues with lock
> > annotations.
> >
> > A first one with regards to the attri
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 03:44:55PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> Venerable RHEL7 clang 3.4.2 has (at least) two issues with lock
> annotations.
>
> A first one with regards to the attribute position:
> ../lib/vhost/vhost.h:518:2: error: GCC does not allow
> assert_exclusive_lock attribute i
Venerable RHEL7 clang 3.4.2 has (at least) two issues with lock
annotations.
A first one with regards to the attribute position:
../lib/vhost/vhost.h:518:2: error: GCC does not allow
assert_exclusive_lock attribute in this position on a
function definition [-Werror,-Wgcc-compat]
5 matches
Mail list logo